11 WORKING GROUPS

Develops a shared vocabulary and stakeholder typology to standardize language, reduce confusion, and improve communication across health decision‑making actors.

Identifies and demonstrates where duplication, overlap, and inefficiencies occur in the health evidence ecosystem to highlight opportunities for better coordination and resource use.

Uses country‑level case studies to map real‑world decision ecosystems, identify barriers and enablers, and surface governance and system‑level “must‑haves” across diverse contexts.

Explores how ethical considerations intersect with evidence and decisions, and how ethics can be more explicitly and systematically integrated into the framework.

Develops practical guidance for implementing the ToE within health systems, including governance models, institutional roles, and strategies for stakeholder engagement.

Maps how primary research feeds into decision processes, clarifying pathways from research production to synthesis, interpretation, and use in policy and practice.

Examines how regulatory agencies, HTA bodies, and reimbursement authorities can better align their processes to improve coherence and reduce fragmentation in decision making.

Focuses on strengthening collaboration across actors and designing effective stakeholder engagement approaches to support shared ownership and uptake of the ToE.

Develops approaches for tracking the implementation and impact of the ToE, including performance indicators, benchmarks, and integration into health systems policy analysis.

Explores how data systems, interoperability, and information infrastructure can support better evidence sharing, transparency, and decision support across the ecosystem.

Investigates how AI, digital tools, and automation can enable the ToE — from mapping decision ecosystems to supporting analysis and integration.